Consensus Date: 28 August 2006
1 PHLN SUMMARY LABORATORY DEFINITION
1.1 Condition:Invasive meningococcal disease
1.1.1 Definitive Criteriaa Isolation of Neisseria meningitidis from a normally sterile site; OR
b Detection of specific meningococcal DNA sequences in a specimen from a normally sterile site by nucleic acid amplification testing.
1.1.2 Suggestive Criteriaa Detection of Gram-negative diplococci in Gram’s stain of specimen from a normally sterile site or from suspicious skin lesion; OR
b High titre immunoglobulin class M (IgM) or significant rise in IgM or immunoglobulin class G (IgG) titres to outer membrane protein antigens of N. meningitidis.
Epidemiology of meningococcal diseaseInvasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is caused by the bacterium N. meningitidis, a Gram-negative diplococcus. The disease occurs sporadically and in clusters and epidemics. Endemic meningococcal disease is found worldwide, sometimes with high disease incidence (hyperendemic disease). Some countries, many of which are in the sub-Saharan ‘meningitis belt’, experience epidemic waves of disease. It is estimated that about 500 000 cases of non-epidemic meningococcal meningitis occur globally each year with a mortality of about 50 000. These numbers do not take account of epidemic disease. No reliable global data are available for forms of invasive meningococcal disease other than meningitis. Even these are estimates as facilities are lacking to distinguish endemic meningococcal meningitis from other causes of cerebrospinal meningitis.
There are 13 serogroups of meningococci recognised. Explosive epidemic disease is mainly caused by serogroup A. The spread of epidemic ‘clones’ of serogroup A meningococci is associated with recurrent pandemics. In recent years epidemic disease with serogroup C and W135 has also been observed in the ‘meningitis belt’. Disease due to serogroup W135 meningococci has also been spread internationally by Hajj pilgrims. In industrialised countries serogroups B and C predominate, with serogroups Y and W135 sometimes also involved. Australia conforms to this pattern in developed countries with about 400–500 cases per year giving an annual incidence of about 2–3 cases of IMD per 100 000 population. Most IMD in Australia is sporadic and due to group B and C meningococci, with some regional variation in the proportion of these two serogroups. Some clusters of serogroup C disease have occurred, but very few instances of serogroup A infections have been seen in recent years. Particular subtypes of serogroups B and C have been responsible for outbreaks and clusters of disease and for hyperendemic disease.
The highest incidence of IMD is in children aged less than 4 years. A secondary peak in incidence occurs in adolescents. Various associations with a higher incidence of IMD are recognised: a seasonal peak in incidence is usual with a majority of cases occurring in late winter/early spring; peak activity is also associated with periods of low absolute humidity; high attack rates are found in poor living conditions and overcrowded housing; nasopharyngeal shedding of respiratory pathogens is associated with an increase in incidence of meningococcal disease; household contacts of meningococcal disease have a risk of acquiring infection approximately 600–1000 times the age-specific incidence in the general population. Mortality is between 5 and 10% in industrialised countries.
Clinical manifestations of invasive meningococcal diseaseIMD is most commonly manifested as septicaemia and/or meningitis. Organ specific disease (e.g. arthritis, pneumonia, pericarditis) may also occur. The meningococcus is carried in the throat from where it invades the bloodstream. The clinical spectrum of disease may range from clinically inapparent bacteraemia to fulminant and rapidly fatal septicaemia. Meningitis is common and is often the only manifestation of IMD and the meninges are seeded during the bacteraemic phase. Early in the disease clinical appearances are often non-specific. When clinical disease manifests, the presentation is determined by bacterial properties such as endotoxin release, and the host response and immune status. One well recognised feature of IMD is a rash, which however, may vary in type or be late or absent in a significant proportion of cases. Fevers and rashes due to other diseases are quite common in young children so that clinical diagnosis is often difficult when classical features of the disease are absent or muted. Thus IMD may be both under diagnosed or wrongly diagnosed on clinical grounds and laboratory confirmation of cases is required.
Top of page
Relevant features of Neisseria meningitidisThe bacterium N. meningitidis is a Gram-negative diplococcus and a human specific pathogen. Strains from invasive disease almost always possess a polysaccharide capsule which defines the serogroup. Humoral immunity to the capsule is an essential factor in prevention of meningococcal disease. Meningococci have a typical Gram-negative cell wall and the lipopolysaccharide components (endotoxin) of the outer membrane are continually shed as blebs during multiplication in vivo provoking the host response and clinical features of the disease. The outer membrane protein component of the cell wall includes immunogenic porin proteins involved in adhesion and attachment of meningococci to epithelial surfaces. Most Neisseria species express one porin protein but meningococci possess and express both porA and porB genes which are relevant to in vitro pheno- or genotyping systems and contribute to virulence. Another relevant feature of meningococci is their genetic diversity, explained in part at least by horizontal inter and intraspecies recombination and acquisition of genetic material from closely related Neisseria species and other genera located in the respiratory tract. These features are relevant to both diagnostic and typing methods for meningococci.
3 Laboratory diagnosis/tests
The laboratory diagnosis of IMD depends on the demonstration of N. meningitidis, or specific meningococcal DNA sequences in samples from normally sterile sites, or positive serology. In situations where there is a strong clinical suspicion of IMD, antibiotic therapy must not be delayed while initiating or awaiting results of diagnostic tests. Latex particle agglutination tests from any site are no longer recommended for the diagnosis of IMD and will not be discussed further. Samples available for this type of testing are best submitted for assay by the more sensitive PCR methodologies now widely available. A trial of an ultrasound enhanced latex agglutination test was undertaken in Australia but results were unsatisfactory12 .
3.1 MicroscopyMicroscopy, if positive for Gram-negative diplococci from sites such as CSF or skin smears, provides a highly specific confirmatory test. The sensitivity and specificity is affected by the adequacy of specimen collection, stage of the disease, intercurrent use of antibiotics and experience of the microscopist.
3.1.1 CSF specimensClassically CSF from a case of meningococcal meningitis reveals a high neutrophil count, low glucose and high protein content. Gram-negative diplococci, if observed within neutrophils, provide evidence of meningococcal meningitis. There are numerous exceptions to this classical picture so that low or absent white cells do not exclude meningitis. In meningococcal disease with high white cell counts the number of organisms may be so low as to be undetectable. Prior administration of antibiotics will remove or else distort the appearance of the diplococci.
184.108.40.206 Test sensitivityThe sensitivity of the Gram’s stain in CSF is estimated to be of the order of 65%. This is affected by the stage of disease, number of organisms present (which may vary considerably between patients) and timing of lumbar puncture in relation to antibiotic administration.
220.127.116.11 Predictive valueA negative CSF examination does not exclude the possibility of invasive meningococcal disease and is of no relevance in the diagnosis of meningococcal septicaemia without meningeal invasion.
Top of page
3.1.2 Aspirates of skin lesions and joint fluid specimensGram’s stains of aspirates from sterile sites obtained on admission provide confirmation of IMD in the presence of a clinically compatible illness, i.e., they are highly specific, but are not sufficiently sensitive, so that a negative result does not exclude IMD.
18.104.22.168 Test sensitivityGram’s stains of skin lesion aspirate or biopsy specimens have a reported sensitivity of 30 to 70% at presentation but this varies with the form of meningococcal disease and type of skin lesion, being highest in haemorrhagic lesions of meningococcal septicaemia1. Skin lesions occur in 50–75% of cases of IMD so that overall sensitivity in all cases of IMD is correspondingly lower. Gram’s stains of skin biopsy may remain positive for long periods (about 48 hours) after antibiotic administration (said to be due to poor penetrability of antibiotics into poorly perfused lesions) but the test sensitivity at this time is not known.
22.214.171.124 Predictive valuePositive predictive value is unknown. False positive tests may occur but the frequency is undefined. Negative predictive value is unknown. A negative result does not exclude IMD.
3.2 Culture of Neisseria meningitidisCulture of N. meningitidis from blood, CSF or other normally sterile site provides unequivocal confirmation of IMD2. Additionally, culture provides isolates for strain differentiation and susceptibility testing. For these reasons all isolates of meningococci from suspected cases of IMD should be sent to the appropriate National Neisseria Network (NNN) laboratory (see Appendix I). In cases where meningococcal disease is suspected clinically, it is STRONGLY RECOMMENDED by the NH&MRC that antibiotics be given before transfer to hospital and not withheld pending collection of diagnostic specimens. This decreases the likelihood of a positive culture but not to the same extent from all sampling sites. Collection of diagnostic samples should nevertheless still proceed even after administration of antibiotics as these samples may still yield a positive culture, and also may be used for non-culture diagnostics such as PCR.
3.2.1 MediaMeningococci are not overly fastidious in their growth requirements and grow well on good quality media such as blood or chocolate agar. These media are suitable for culture from sterile sites. For culture from non-sterile sites such as the throat, selective media such as Modified New York City or Modified Thayer Martin medium are required.
Culture plates should be incubated for a minimum of 48 hours with a source of 5% CO2.
3.2.2 Suitable specimensBlood for culture should always be obtained, CSF, skin sterile site, rash aspirate, skin biopsy. Throat swabs in cases of suspected IMD only.
Top of page
3.2.3 Test sensitivitySeveral variables affect the sensitivity of blood cultures in IMD: the number
of blood cultures collected, the volume of the sample (it is difficult to collect anything other than small volumes in infants), and the prior use of antibiotics. Cultivation of meningococci from liquid media is compromised by anticoagulants usually present in blood culture media. The sensitivity of blood culture is reported to be only 50% in untreated cases of IMD falling to 5% or less if antibiotics have been used3.The sensitivity of CSF culture is about 95% in cases of untreated meningococcal meningitis. This percentage falls rapidly after treatment as viable meningococci are quickly cleared from CSF. It is again emphasised that a negative CSF culture does not exclude non-meningeal IMD. Culture of skin aspirates/biopsies is similar in sensitivity to Gram’s stain of the same lesion. Combined Gram’s stain/culture of skin lesions has a sensitivity of about 60–65%, but is higher for haemorrhagic lesions of meningococcal septicaemia1. Throat swabs (post nasal or per nasal) may yield meningococci in about 50% of cases of IMD and are less affected by prior antibiotic therapy4. In sporadic cases, a positive culture provides corroborative but not definitive evidence of IMD. Routine swabbing of close contacts is not recommended nor are throat swabs for meningococci suggested where meningococcal disease is not suspected clinically or in outbreaks.
3.2.4 Test specificityApproaches 100% if isolation of confirmed N. meningitidis from sterile site. In sporadic cases, a positive throat swab culture provides corroborative but not definitive evidence of IMD. Routine swabbing of close contacts is not recommended nor are throat swabs for meningococci suggested where meningococcal disease is not suspected clinically or in outbreaks.
3.2.5 Predictive valuesPositive predictive value approaches 100% for sterile site specimens. A negative culture does not exclude IMD and depends on the adequacy of collection, specimen transport and storage conditions prior to culture, stage of disease and prior antibiotic treatment.
3.2.6 Suitable acceptance criteriaIsolation of a N. meningitidis confirmed by biochemical and phenotypic parameters.
3.2.7 Suitable internal controlsA properly documented, relevant, quality control program for each type and batch of medium used.
3.2.8 Suitable external QC programmesDifficulties arise with QA/QC for N. meningitidis insofar as it is an organism with a lethal potential and has been associated with laboratory-acquired infection. For these reasons the RCPA/NATA programme rarely if ever includes cultures of meningococci in its surveys.
Top of page
3.3 Identification of Neisseria meningitidisPresumptive identification can be based on Gram’s stain and oxidase reaction, but definitive diagnosis requires confirmation by a combination of tests including those for detection of acid production, and if necessary, enzyme substrate tests (meningococci are gamma-glutamyl aminopeptidase positive—this is a rapid test and a suitable substrate is readily obtainable from clinical chemistry departments), nitrate reduction and superoxol tests, polysaccharide/sucrose production tests meningococci are negative but N. polysaccharea positive on 1% sucrose agars); and susceptibility to colistin18 (meningococci are colistin resistant and will grow on selective media containing VCN inhibitor).
3.3.1 Presumptive identificationGrowth of Gram negative diplococci which are oxidase positive.
3.3.2 Definitive identificationTests for production of acid from glucose and maltose supplemented, if necessary, by enzyme substrate tests, nitrate reduction and superoxol tests, polysaccharide/sucrose production tests, and susceptibility to colistin..18
3.3.3 Predictive valuesOther Neisseria such as N. polysaccharea, some N. subflava and, rarely, lactose-negative N. lactamica may produce similar acid production reactions. Only a small amount of acid is produced by the Neisseria, and that this is not always detected. For a number of reasons the traditional cystine trypticase agar test (CTA) is no longer recommended for this purpose by the CDC and rapid non-growth dependent tests for carbohydrate production are now preferred by them19.
3.3.4 Suitable test criteriaRefer to instruction leaflet for commercial kits and published data for in house tests 20.
3.3.5 Suitable internal controlsThe NNN provides appropriate type culture N. meningitidis controls.
3.3.6 Suitable validation criteriaDefined by the manufacturer of commercial kits or published method for in house tests20
Aberrant results should be further investigated by molecular techniques21.
3.3.7 External QC programmesNone widely available owing to the dangerous nature of this organism. The NNN laboratories conduct a QA programme for their participating laboratories.
3.4 Strain differentiation of Neisseria meningitidisDifferentiation of meningococci from cases of invasive meningococcal disease is undertaken for public health reasons, e.g., to confirm or to exclude a suspected outbreak of cases. A true epidemiological link between cases can only be established by public health investigations. Laboratory typing results can confirm or exclude such a link, but do not establish one in the absence of these public health data.
Top of page
3.5 SerotypingCurrently isolates are phenotyped by NNN laboratories by determining the serogroup as soon as practicable after receipt and then the serotype and serosubtype using standard monoclonal reagents. Serotyping and serosubtyping is performed by batching of isolates and testing at regular intervals – less frequently in low incidence periods and more frequently in the winter/spring. Serotyping and subserotyping is NOT routinely performed on an emerging basis as it is wasteful of reagents which are no longer produced. These techniques can however be rapidly employed if an epidemiological link between cases is established or suspected and can quickly exclude the presence of clustering of cases. However, many serogroup B strains are non-typable and reagent stocks are finite.
3.6 Molecular TypingGenotyping (molecular) procedures are now supplanting phenotyping (serotyping) methods. Those available include pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), porA/porB sequencing and MLST.
These techniques are used for different purposes, e.g. PFGE and porA sequencing are used for short-term studies of strain relatedness and MLST for longer term population studies of meningococci. PFGE methods are not uniform between laboratories. Further, PFGE patterns are usually considered of short-term use for differentiating suspected outbreaks under local conditions. Thus inter-laboratory comparisons of PFGE patterns are not suitable for distinguishing invasive meningococci separated temporally and/or geographically across Australia.
Similarly porA/porB typing can be applied for short term examination of possible outbreaks but is less also suited to long term longitudinal genotyping studies. A global standard nomenclature for porA sequencing is being developed, meaning that greater comparability of strains can be achieved by this means. A world wide web database can be accessed via the internet at http://neisseria.org/perl/agdbnet/agdbnet.pl?file=poravr.xml for classifying porA genotypes. Other genotyping systems are also being developed such as fetA which are accessible via the same website.
MLST is currently a technique more appropriately used for long-term population studies of meningococcal populations as it examines more stable parts of the genome. Its use defines clonal complexes of invasive meningococci and related sequence types within these clonal complexes.
It should also be remembered that the presence of isolates with an indistinguishable phenotype (serogroup, serotype and serosubtype) or genotype does not of itself establish a true epidemiological link which should first be properly established by clinical public health procedures.
The application and development of these techniques in Australia is under constant review by the NNN.
3.7 Serological DiagnosisSerological testing, based on an enzyme immunoassay using outer membrane proteins (OMP) as the antigens, was developed by the UK PHLS Meningococcal Reference Centre9. The assay has value in retrospective diagnosis of IMD when culture has been negative due to early antibiotic treatment or CSF has not been available for PCR. This laboratory kindly supplied methods, suitable isolates for antigen preparation reagents and controls for use in Australia and the OMP test has now been evaluated under local conditions10. A second assay has been described for the detection of antibodies to the polysaccharide component of serogroup C meningococci and this too has been evaluated and used in Australia11. No assay is available for serogroup B antibody.
3.7.1 SpecimensSerum is preferred but assays can be performed on plasma.
3.7.2 Test sensitivityThe sensitivity of the OMP assay has been shown to approach 100% in adults and older children (4 years or older) in culture proven culture positive cases of IMD from 5–21 days after presentation. A single high IgM titre is usually sufficient for diagnosis in these age groups. However, the assay is slightly less sensitive in children less than 4 years of age owing to different kinetics of their antibody production and paired sera are currently required for diagnosis in this age group. Sensitivity of the Serogroup C assay for disease due to serogroup C meningococci is slightly lower than the OMP assay.
Top of page
3.7.3 Test specificityThe OMP assay has a specificity of approximately 94%. OMP antibody may be formed by exposure to commensal Neisseria that share identical or closely related OMPs and in some cases of disseminated gonococcal infection. Serogroup C assay is more specific but becomes positive after immunisation with vaccines containing serogroup C polysaccharide as well as after IMD.
3.7.4 Predictive valuesThe negative predictive value of both assays is high and can be used to exclude IMD in clinically notified but unconfirmed cases of IMD. Positive predictive values: High if used to confirm IMD in cases of clinically compatible disease. The OMP assay should not be used as a screening test because of cross-reactions with other Neisseria. Antibodies develop after natural exposure to serogroup C meningococci and also after vaccination. Its usefulness for diagnostic purposes is thus limited to those who are not immunised with serogroup C vaccines (either conjugated or polyvalent unconjugated types). This assay is useful for the detection of antibody post vaccination, that is, it can detect the success or failure of the vaccination process.
3.7.5 Suitable test criteriaPositive IgM test in a single sample or seroconversion if paired sera are available from a patient with a recent infection compatible with meningococcal infection.
3.7.6 Suitable internal controlsThe concentrations and dilutions of antigen conjugate and serum are determined using chequerboard titrations of known positive (culture confirmed) and negative serum. The cut off value was established using samples from blood donors as well as serum from patients with throat carriage without evidence of IMD. International standard anti C capsule serum from CDC used to calibrate the C capsule antibody assay.
3.7.7 Suitable validation criteriaSpecificity calculated using serum from a variety of other bacterial and viral diseases. Sensitivity calculated using serum collected at known times after culture confirmed IMD.
3.7.8 External QC programmesNone available.
Top of page
3.8 Nucleic Acid DiagnosisMore rapid treatment of suspected cases of meningococcal disease with effective antimicrobials and reluctance to lumbar puncture mean that NAA—essentially PCR in this disease—are becoming more important in the laboratory diagnosis of IMD. PCR assays may increase the laboratory diagnosis of cases of meningococcal disease by more than 30%5 and meningococcal DNA in CSF samples5 has been detected up to 72 hours after commencement of antimicrobial treatment6. The target sequence most used for PCR based assays is the ctrA gene. PCR tests for serogroup determination should be performed both from a confirmatory and epidemiological point of view. Primers for various regions in the siaD gene specific for serogroups B, C, W135 and Y have been published8. Serogroup determination for B and C meningococci by PCR is widely performed in Australia. Positive meningococcal DNA preparations should be stored (preferably at –70 °C) for subsequent porA/porB sequencing and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) analysis if required.
PCR-based diagnosis provides confirmation of IMD from blood, CSF or other normally sterile sites with a validity comparable to that of culture-based diagnosis. Additionally, nucleic acid methods can provide diagnostic information pertinent to patient care and public health management. For these reasons it is recommended that (i) samples such as CSF and EDTA blood from which DNA was extracted for PCR based diagnosis as well as (ii) the residual DNA remaining after PCR testing, both be sent to the appropriate NNN laboratory (see Appendix I). (The original samples of CSF and EDTA blood should be forwarded to ensure adequate amounts of DNA and uncontaminated DNA preparations are available as required.)
3.8.1 Suitable specimensPrimarily applied to CSF and blood specimens
3.8.2 Test sensitivity>95% for CSF using ctrA gene sequence amplification7and approx. 87% when testing blood samples 6,27 . Data is not available for skin lesions.
3.8.3 Test Specificity> 95% or more when using ctrA gene sequence amplification7.
3.8.4 Predictive valuesPositive Predictive value of 98% and negative predictive value of 86% when testing CSF samples to the serogroup level8. A negative NAA test does not totally exclude IMD in a patient with compatible symptoms and signs.
3.8.5 Suitable test criteriaN. meningitidis NAA can be performed on blood or CSF samples when invasive meningococcal infection is suspected.
3.8.6 Suitable internal controlsThe exact number of controls required for PCR-based systems depends on the number of samples in each run, although in general, two types of negative control should be included: a sample that is negative for the abnormality or pathogen and a ‘no nucleic acid’ sample (i.e., all reagents except the DNA/RNA). Negative controls should be placed after the last patient samples. Where test runs are expected to contain a large proportion of positive results, then it is recommended that additional ‘no template’ controls be interspersed among the patient samples at an appropriate frequency as validated by the particular laboratory. This should also be done if contamination problems have occurred.
Positive controls should preferably be just above the limit of sensitivity of the test. Negative controls should be dispensed last so they reflect the state of the reagents added. These controls should be subject to the whole test process, including the extraction Inhibition Controls the use of an inhibition control for each test sample should also be used to ensure the absence of any inhibitory substances within the nucleic acid extract. Refer See the relevant NPAAC standards.28,29
3.8.7 Suitable validation criteriaAssays should be validated in accordance with appropriate guidelines and NPAAC standards 28, 29
3.8.8 Suitable quality assurance programmesThere is currently no external quality assurance programme offered in Australia for NAA of
Top of page
4 References1. van Deuren, van Dijke, BJ, Koopman RJJ, Horrevors AM, Meis JFGM, Santman FW, van der Meer JWM. Rapid diagnosis of acute meningococcal infections by needle aspiration or biopsy of skin lesions. Br Med J 1993;306:1229-1232.
2. PHLS Meningococcal Infections Working Group and Public Health Medicine Environmental Group. Control of meningococcal disease: guidance for consultants in communicable disease control. Communicable Disease Report Review 1995;5: R189-R195.
3. Cartwright KAV, Reilly S, White D, Stuart J. Early treatment with parenteral penicillin in meningococcal disease. Br Med J 1992;305:143-147.
4. Cartwright KAV, Stuart JM, Jones DM, Noah ND. The Stonehouse survey: nasopharyngeal carriage of meningococci and Neisseria lactamica. Epidemiol Infect 1987;99:591-601.
5. Ragunathan, L, Ramsay M, Borrow Respiratory, Guiver M, Gray S, Kaczmarski EB. Clinical features, laboratory findings and management of meningococcal meningitis in England and Wales: report of a 1997 survey. Meningococcal meningitis: 1997 survey report. J Infect 2000;40:74-79
6. Bryant PA, Hua YL, Zaia A, Griffith J, Hogg G, Curtis N, Carapetis J. Prospective study of a real-time PCR that is sensitive, specific, and clinically useful for diagnosis of meningococcal disease in children. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:2919-2925.
7. Porritt RJ, Mercer J, Munro R. Detection and serogroup determination of Neisseria meningitidis in CSF by polymerase chain reaction. Pathology 2000;32:42-5
8. Muhamed-Kheir Taha Simultaneous approach for nonculture PCR-based identification and serogroup prediction of Neisseria meningitidis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:885-857
9. Jones DM, Kaczmarski EB. Meningococcal infections in England and Wales:1994. Communicable Diseases Report Review 1995;5:R125-R130.
10. Robertson PW, Reinbott P, Duffy Y, Binotto E, Tapsall J.W. Confirmation of invasive meningococcal disease by single point estimation of IgM antibody to outer membrane protein of Neisseria meningitidis. Pathology 2001;33:375-378.
11. Lahra MM, Robertson PW, Whybin R, Tapsall JW. Enhanced serological diagnosis of invasive meningococcal disease by determining anti-group C capsule IgM antibody by EIA. Pathology 2005;37:239-241.
12. Porritt RJ, Mercer JL, Munro, M. Ultrasound-enhanced latex immunoagglutination test (USELAT) for detection of capsular polysaccharide antigen of Neisseria meningitidis from CSF and plasma. Pathology 2003;35:61-64.
13. Rosenstein NE, Perkins BA. Update on Haemophilus influenzae serotype b and meningococcal vaccines. Pediatric Clinics of North America 2000;47:337-352.
14. Stephens DS, Hajjeh RA, Baughman WS, Harvey RC, Wenger JD, Farley MM. Sporadic meningococcal disease in adults: results of a 5-year population-based study. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:937-940.
15. Winstead JM McKinsey DS, Tasker S De Groote MA, Badour LM. Meningococcal pneumonia: characterization and review cases seen over the past 25 years. Clin Infect Dis 2000;30:87-94.
16. Barquet N, Gasser I, Domingo P, Moraga FA, Macaya A, Elcuaz R. Promary meningococcal conjunctivitis: report of 21 patients and review. Ren Infect Dis1990;12:838-847.
17. Poulos RG, Smedley EJ, Ferson MJ, Bolisetty S, Tapsall JW. Refining the public health response to primary meningococcal conjunctivitis. Commun Dis Intell 2002;26:592-595.
18. Knapp J S 1988. Historical perspectives and identification of Neisseria and related species. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1:415-431.
19. CDC Division of AIDS, STD and TB Laboratory Research. Neisseria meningitidis. 2000.
20. Tapsall JW, Cheng JK. Rapid identification of pathogenic species of Neisseria by carbohydrate degradation tests. Importance of glucose in media used for preparation of inocula. Br J Vener Dis 1981;57:249-252.
21. Zaia A, Griffith JM, Hogan TR, Tapsall JW, Bainbridge P, Neil R, Tribe D. Molecular tests can allow confirmation of invasive meningococcal disease when isolates yield atypical maltose, glucose or gamma-glutamyl peptidase results. Pathology 2005;37:378-379.
23. Tapsall JW, Shultz TR, Limnios EA, Munro, R, Mercer J, Porritt R, Griffith J, Hogg G, Lum, G, Lawrence A, Hansman D, Collignon P, Southwell P, Ott K, Gardam M, Richardson CJL, Bates J, Murphy D, Smith H. Surveillance of antibiotic resistance in invasive isolates of Neisseria meningitidis in Australia 1994 – 1999. Pathology 2001;33:359-361.
23. Shultz TR, Tapsall JW, White PA, Ryan C, Lyras D, Rood J, Binotto E,
Richardson CRJ. Chloramphenicol resistant Neisseria meningitidis containing catP isolated in Australia. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2003;52:856-859.
24. Shultz TR, Tapsall JW, White PA, Newton PJ. An invasive isolate of Neisseria meningitidis showing decreased susceptibility to quinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000;44:1116.
25. Shultz TR, White PA, Tapsall JW. An in-vitro assessment of the further potential for development of quinolone resistance in Neisseria meningitidis. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2005;49:1753-1760.
26. Tapsall J and members of the National Neisseria Network of Australia. Antimicrobial testing and applications in the pathogenic Neisseria. In: Merlino J, ed., Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: methods and practices with an Australian perspective. Australian Society for Microbiology, Sydney, 2004. pp 175-188.
27. Hackett S J, Carrol ED, Guiver M, Marsh J, Sills JA, Thomson APJ, Kaczmarski EB Improved case confirmation in meningococcal disease with whole blood Taqman PCR Arch. Dis. Child. 2002; 86;449-452.
28. National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council. Laboratory Accreditation Standards and Guidelines for Nucleic Acid Detection and Analysis. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia, 2006.
ISBN: 0 642 82974 8 Online ISBN: 0 642 82975 6
29. National Pathology Accreditation Advisory Council. Requirements for the Validation of in-house in vitro Diagnostic Devices (IVDs) . Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, Canberra, Australia. 2004.
ISBN: 0 642 82439 8
Top of page
APPENDIX IParticipants in the Meningococcal Surveillance Programme of the National Neisseria Network (to whom isolates should be sent and enquiries directed) are listed below.
John Bates/Denise Murphy/Helen Smith,
Public Health Microbiology
Queensland Health Scientific Services
39 Kessels Road
Coopers Plains Qld 4108
Telephone: +61 7 3274 9101
Facsimile : +61 7 3274 9008
Ms K. Bayley/Dr A.D.Keil
Department of Microbiology
Princess Margaret Hospital for Children
1 Thomas Street
Subiaco WA 6008
Telephone: +61 8 9340 8273
Facsimile: +61 8 9380 4474
Dr A. Macgregor/Mr Mark Gardam
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Royal Hobart Hospital
GPO Box 1061L
Hobart Tasmania 7001
Telephone: +61 26 2388 410
Mr A. Lawrence
Women’s and Children’s Hospital
72 King William Road
North Adelaide SA 5006
Telephone: +61 8 8161 6376
Facsimile: +61 8 8161 6051
Australian Capital Territory
Prof. P. Collignon/Ms S. Bradbury.
The Canberra Hospital
PO Box 11
Woden ACT 2606
Telephone: +61 6 244 2425
Dr G. Lum and staff
Royal Darwin Hospital
Tiwi NT 0810
Telephone: +61 8 8922 8034
Facsimile: +61 8 8922 8843
Dr G. Hogg
Microbiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory(PHL)
Microbiology and Immunology Department
University of Melbourne
Parkville Victoria 3052
Telephone: +61 3 8344 5701
Facsimile: +61 3 8344 7833
New South Wales
J. Tapsall/A. Limnios/S.Ray
The Prince of Wales Hospital
Randwick NSW 2031
Telephone: +61 2 9382 9079
Facsimile: +61 2 9398 4275
J. Mercer/R. Porrit
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
Locked Mail Bag 90
Liverpool NSW 2179
Telephone: +61 2 9828 5128
Facsimile: +61 2 9828 5129